{34}

Appendix 10.

(a) The following are the details of the 16 rivals for the Coldrum ley obtained inthe 100 Main Preref simulations. As indicated in Appendix 9.1, these are actually simulations using 127 sites, as lines involving site 121 were deleted after the program was run. In the case of the churches, an entry like “TR19” for Trottiscliffe church means that this church is identified as No. 19 in Ward [5] and is therefore probably Saxon in origin. A cross next to a church name indicates that the church does not appear in the Textus Roffensis, and so is assumed not to be of Saxon origin. A question mark next to a chapel or abbey indicates that we are not aware of any Saxon origin.

{35}

Simulation 2

 89)TQ 64598 60900Trottiscliffe Church [TR.19]
113)TQ 65340 60856Coldrum Long Barrow
 11)TQ 68930 60567Birling Church [TR.26]
118)TQ 74483 60129Kit’s Coty
120)TQ 75705 60039White Horse Stone
 
Length = 11140 mWidth = 13 m

This is the “extraordinary chance alinement” described above. In addition to the details already given we should perhaps mention that a few metres from the hill-top cross-track at TQ 7766 5987 there is marked, on the 1:2500 plan, the site of an ancient stone called the Jostling Stone.


Simulation 12

111)TQ 68863 57880West Malling Abbey
 26)TQ 70644 58695Ditton Church [TR.32]
119)TQ 74995 60698Little Kit’s Coty
120)TQ 75311 60834White Horse Stone
 
Length = 7092 mWidth = 8 m

Simulation 21

118)TQ 74977 60653Kit’s Coty
120)TQ 75599 60340White Horse Stone
 25)TQ 79089 58678Detling Church ×
 88)TQ 80800 57885Thurnham Church ×
 
Length = 6447 mWidth = 18 m

The Pilgrim’s Way roughly follows along this ley for 2 miles


Simulation 36

 68)TQ 64609 52764West Peckham Church [TR.15]
 67)TQ 66253 52944East Peckham Church [TR.14]
 87)TQ 70833 53476Teston Church [TR.83]
 28)TQ 71303 53536West Farleigh Church ×
 
Length = 6738 mWidth = 9 m

Simulation 38, Ley 1

 26)TQ 70687 58448Ditton Church [TR.32]
 58)TQ 70917 57483East Malling Church [TR.28]
  6)TQ 71624 54609Barming Church [TR.144]
 28)TQ 71965 53023West Farleigh Church ×
 
Length = 5398 mWidth = 5 m

Simulation 38, Ley 2

 89)TQ 64953 60903Trottiscliffe Church [TR.19]
113)TQ 65912 60363Coldrum Long Barrow
 73)TQ 67408 59506Ryarsh Church [TR.30]
 58)TQ 70917 57483East Malling Church [TR.28]
 
Length = 6875 mWidth = 9 m

As with Simulation 2, we have a fake ley through Coldrum and Trottiscliffe, confirmed by the tunnel legend.


{36}

Simulation 44

114)TQ 63864 59341Tumulus
  1)TQ 65097 58850Addington Church [TR.49]
 63)TQ 66521 58300Offham Church [TR.31]
 59)TQ 67672 57875West Malling Church [TR.147]
 
Length = 4080 mWidth = 16 m

Simulation 46, Ley 1

  6)TQ 71769 54558Barming Church [TR.144]
 27)TQ 73790 53610East Farleigh Church [TR.16]
 53)TQ 75966 52606Loose Church ×
122)TQ 78059 51651Earthwork
 
Length = 6929 mWidth = 12 m

The earthwork is described as a “massive rampart and ditch” possibly of Belgic origin (Archaeologia Cantiana, 80, 277).


Simulation 46, Ley 2

 89)TQ 64295 60461Trottiscliffe Church [TR.19]
 73)TQ 67111 59059Ryarsh Church [TR.30]
 51)TQ 68336 58425Leybourne Church [TR.79]
 58)TQ 70441 57354East Malling Church [TR.28]
 
Length = 6886 mWidth = 19 m

This ley also goes through site 121, a probably medieval earthwork. Is this a confirmation point (like a moat)?


Simulation 47

108)TQ 66981 56686Remains of chapel [?]
 59)TQ 67239 57652West Malling Church [TR.147]
 73)TQ 67737 59524Ryarsh Church [TR.30]
 66)TQ 68458 62165Paddlesworth Church [TR.27]
 
Length = 5674 mWidth = 8 m

The 1:2500 plan calls site 108 “St Blaise’s Chapel” (in antique script) but IBehrend have no further information. Paddlesworth Church is one of several in this area mentioned by Walter Johnson, Byways in British Archaeology (1912) as containing sarsens, and therefore possibly on pagan sites.


Simulation 60

  1)TQ 65900 58114Addington Church [TR.49]
 63)TQ 66922 58141Offham Church [TR.31]
 51)TQ 68238 58213Leybourne Church [TR.79]
 26)TQ 70101 58300Ditton Church [TR.32]
 
Length = 4205 mWidth = 18 m

Simulation 61

 18)TQ 71744 61813Burham Church [TR.35]
118)TQ 74636 60307Kit’s Coty
119)TQ 74655 60282Little Kit’s Coty
120)TQ 75146 60036White Horse Stone
 13)TQ 77629 58712Boxley Church ×
 
Length = 6652 mWidth = 15 m

Here is a 5-pointer that is shorter than the real Coldrum 4-pointer (but sites 118 and 119 are only 31 metres apart). On the 1:2500 plan the ley is seen to pass within a few metres of a cross marking the site of St Stephen’s Chapel; hence it presumably went through some part of the chapel fabric. The chapel in turn was next to the Coffin Stone (TQ 74013 60593) which “in all probability” is the remains of a burial chamber (Ronald Jessup, South East England, in Thames & Hudson’s series Ancient People and Places).


{37}

Simulation 66

 96)TQ 61446 59928Wrotham Church [TR.44]
114)TQ 63357 59347Tumulus
  1)TQ 65802 58584Addington Church [TR.49]
 63)TQ 66678 58304Offham Church [TR.31]
 
Length = 5478 mWidth = 11 m

Simulation 87

 66)TQ 68969 62363Paddlesworth Church [TR.27]
 79)TQ 70212 61253Snodland Church [TR.43]
  5)TQ 72106 59599Aylesford Church [TR.24]
109)TQ 72945 58883The Friars, Aylesford [?]
 65)TQ 78232 54222Otham Church ×
 
Length = 12332 mWidth = 19 m

A 5-pointer that includes a 4-pointer shorter than the Coldrum ley. See Simulation 47 for Paddlesworth.


Simulation 89

111)TQ 68434 57844West Malling Abbey [?]
 26)TQ 70098 58548Ditton Church [TR.32]
119)TQ 74222 60261Little Kit’s Coty
118)TQ 74665 60454Kit’s Coty
 
Length = 6755 mWidth = 8 m

Simulation 92

 59)TQ 67833 57531West Malling Church [TR.147]
111)TQ 68073 57663West Malling Abbey [?]
  5)TQ 72888 59880Aylesford Church [TR.24]
119)TQ 74117 60447Little Kit’s Coty
 
Length = 6927 mWidth = 18 m

Confirmed by passing through a moat at TQ 7394 6038 (not shown on the 1:50000 map).


(b) The following alinements are those which consist of definitely ancient sites or churches which feature in the Textus Roffensis:

Simulation 2Simulation 46, ley 2
Simulation 38, ley 2Simulation 60
Simulation 44Simulation 66

Since four of the five sites on the alinement from Simulation 61 are ancient or Saxon, this line counts as well. The alinement from Simulation 47 may be acceptable, depending on the antiquity of St Blaise’s Chapel. Thus 7 or 8 of the 16 Coldrum beaters meet a “Saxon or earlier” requirement.

(c) There were 3 alinements involving site 121 which were rivals for the Coldrum ley. They were:

{38}

Sim.Length (km)Width (m)Sites
 76.910 51– 57– 58–121
347.118  6–119–120–121
747.012  1– 51–111–121

Obviously since these are all 4-pointers and include site 121, none of them meets the Saxon-or-earlier condition.

(d) There were 16 lines which actually beat the Coldrum ley, but it is worth reflecting that there were another 55 lines, all 4-pointers, longer than the Coldrum ley but still under 10km in length – short enough to attract a ley hunter’s attention. All were 20 m or less in width, of course, but 23 of them were 13 m or less. Only 4 of the 55 lines involved site 121.