Critical Notes

M. W. Saunders

CONTRIBUTOR COMMENTS ON CONTRIBUTION
J Rutherford Interesting within its terms of reference. 
David Randell Interesting within its terms of reference. 
M W Saunders Have just added to this folio, a paper entitled “Databank for an Inhabited Extrasolar Planet”.  (Yellow Cover) Also attached herewith, three sheets:—
  a) p9 Appendix to “Pyramid–Mars Connection”
b) “Height/Baselength; 9 Oct 76”
c) “Great Circle Calculations”, from a book published by the RSGBRadio Society of Great Britain
J W L Ivimy Informative.  This must have introduced the subject to many people during the last year or so. 
Stuart Greenwood Mr Greenwood’s approaches are quite interesting.  Let us hope that someone will examine his observations in depth.  (See Gt. Ccl. Calcs, herewith) I’ve checked some of his calculations very briefly, and have no serious criticism.  (Newgrange; Stonehenge; Carnac; and Giza, can be aligned.)
Robert Forrest I find Mr Forrest’s paper on “coincidences” to be of a high standard.  He gives some good examples. 
  His chapter entitled “Control Theories” on p4, is particularly important.  (This chapter could perhaps be read in conjunction with “Invalidation Tests” on p4 of “‘Pyramid–Mars Connection”; and also with “Logic of Indication System” on p15 of “Databank for an I E P”.)
  Mr Forrest’s approach is valuable as it stands.  And it would be of additional value, if it could be taken just a little further; so as to embrace situations where a relevant “group of relationships”, indicates a “group of data” belonging to the suggested object. 

I look forward to making more detailed comments on the contributions, next time round. 

M. W. Saunders